Saturday, December 25th 2021 -Phoenix, Arizona
Opening Statement
THE WORST CASE OF WALMART EMPLOYEE ABUSE IN U.S. HISTORY
The above, bold, and all caps heading should read: ABUSES, here’s why. Listing the provable charges against Walmart: Child endangerment[1] —
Sexual Harassment—Retaliation—Claudia’s Walmart Job Applications[2]—Repeated False Accusations of Theft—Attempted Framing Claudia for Class 4 Felony Shoplifting—Filing a false police report for shoplifting and at least two Title VII violations of The 1967 Civil Rights Act plus overwhelming circumstantial evidence indicating Walmart violated Arizona State Law regarding falsification of evidence,[3] a Class 6 felony. In addition, overwhelming circumstantial evidence indicates Walmart is guilty of withholding exculpatory evidence and possible subordination of perjury. 
These charges are more serious and are classified as Class 4 felonies. We also prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Walmart, knowingly, via an employee/witness under oath, did commit perjury under material circumstances.
The child endangerment is probably the most despicable of the lot but Walmart’s attempted frameup[4] for felony shoplifting, had it succeeded, would have literally destroyed Claudia’s life; her ability to ever get a decent job. She would have been doomed ever after to a life of abject poverty and this, in turn, would have robbed her two little boys of the rest of their childhood. Her family is still intact thus far, thanks only to her husband’s elderly grandparents, but all is hanging together by a thread.[5]
Defendants do not make these felonious accusations lightly and debated at length whether or not to include these serious charges in our effort. Conclusion: we found ourselves caught up in a classic Catch-22 dilemma.
The facts of this matter with regards to Walmart committing felonies in their mad pursuit of a conviction are facts we’d prefer to not make public. However, if we don’t spill all the beans, the jury will never know the truth about how Walmart set out to destroy Claudia’s life. Now, this Catch-22 dilemma does cut both ways. If Walmart takes stringent action against our website with the powers of social media being what they are, Walmart tarnishes the brand even more.
NOTICE to Walmart, Inc. Legal Department: we have gone over and over this indictment numerous times looking for unsubstantiated accusations and other errata in order to avoid giving Walmart any excuse to file a lawsuit or have our website taken down. We have found none but on the advice of counsel, we have redacted the names of all Walmart actors and others directly involved in this matter.
The big picture is very big and the drama is very long (5 years long) with a lengthy cast of characters. This Opening Statement and the report itself, are in fact long, but lengthy out of necessity—five years of continuous abuse naturally makes for a long story. But, whoever said there’s a strict time schedule? [6] The finder of fact is encouraged to take all the time they want to carefully read, reread, and clearly understand Walmart Legal’s hateful efforts to convict Claudia of a crime they had to have known she did not commit.
As stated above, we are well aware this appeal makes for some time-consuming and tedious reading. To those strapped for time or disinclined to read long-winded presentations, we suggest the following: Follow this link, Synopsis, and begin reading the top of the page. Then click on A-2. This file tells you more, faster about Walmart’s legal sins than any other. This LINK provides valuable insight into the matter.
BEGINS THE STORY
The serially abused ex Walmart employee is a now fortysomething Hispanic woman by the name of Claudia Maria Sobarzo living in Phoenix, AZ. After learning how Walmart bullied and humiliated her over the five-year period after she was promoted to an assistant store manager’s position in 2015, readers can decide if they would be interested in becoming a member of what will be the largest (several million strong) and most socially diverse Civil Case Jury ever impaneled. A dear friend likened these unorthodox legal tactics to a reality show/video game. Let’s call this video game National Jury Duty: Walmart, Inc. on Trial. Claudia M. Sobarzo, a destitute female ex-employee, will put the world’s largest and wealthiest retailer ($400) billion), Walmart, Inc., on trial —ONLINE. You, as a member of the jury, will see and hear what a Federal Judge and jury would have had the time, circumstance, and money not forced Claudia to abandon her action against Walmart in The U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.
As for Walmart’s side of the story? Defendants have presented Walmart’s case for them and beyond this, we say what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Walmart is perfectly free to counter our claims by whatever method it chooses. Walmart’s response should be interesting now that the facts of the matter are arrayed for all the world to see. If you elect to play along, be sure to take lots of notes because we guarantee this to be the most grotesquely complicated shoplifting case in U.S. History taking more twists and turns than solving a 4 x 4 Rubik’s Cube. [7]
[1] The Walmart manager’s reckless behavior in grabbing the cart while in motion, placed the top-heavy, eight-year-old boy, sitting on the two cases of beer in danger. He could have easily toppled onto the pavement. return
[2] Walmart local management blacklisted Claudia. She applied for 100 jobs but was never even called for an interview. return
[3] This charge also includes filing a false Police Report (a Class 1. Misdemeanor). Report is false on its face which places it in the hard evidence file. return
[4] This is a serious charge but one backed up by at least two pieces of strong evidence. The Walmart actor’s intent is clear and can’t simply be a mistake. There was no evidence whatsoever for the first charge of “concealment” and no credible evidence for the last, the beer heist. The Liquor Aisle video makes clear Liar No. 1. is lying and not just mistaken. return
[5] 11-29-21: At last! Claudia’s self-esteem is trickling back. She has a job paying entry-level wages, not nearly enough to support herself but it is a start. Sometimes the road back can be a long and winding one? return
[6] Most folks will need about 20 minutes for their first reading to gain a pretty good idea of what this case is all about. Odds are these same folk, if members of a real jury, couldn’t even drive to a real courthouse in 20 minutes. So what’s the problem? BTW, what better way is there to spend one’s time than helping at-risk children? return
[7] F.Y.I. there are 7.40 quattuordecillion permutations in a 4 x 4 Rubik’s Cube. return